Make better, faster decisions
Decision-making software that meets your team where they work. Fewer meetings and faster execution toward what matters.
#reimbursements

Kevin Hayes
5 minutes ago
My team's frustrated with long reimbursements over $1,000. We've had deals slow down waiting for approvals on travel or client events. It's hurting momentum.

Nancy Johnson
3 minutes ago
Anything over $1,000 needs Finance + requesting VP approval. On paper it's 1-2 days, lately closer to a week. Biggest bottleneck is getting both approvers at the same time.

Neil Sharma
2 minutes ago
@Orgtools what options do we have to streamline this?

Orgtools
Which AI team member should help with this?
VP - Finance
Thanks for raising this, Neil. I understand the frustration, and you're right - we need to balance control with business velocity. Let me outline a few potential solutions:
1. We could implement tiered approvals:
- Keep dual approval >$5000
- Single approval (Finance or VP) for $1000-$5000
- Auto-approve recurring/predictable expenses like standard travel
2. We should leverage our expense system better:
- Pre-approved travel budgets by deal stage/client size
- Automated routing to backup approvers after 24h
- Batch approvals for recurring vendor events
Nancy's right about the timing issues. I'd suggest we pilot single-approval for Q1, measure any risk impacts, and adjust from there. Anthony's point about out-of-pocket impact is concerning — we should prioritize fixing this to maintain team morale and deal momentum.
I can draft updated approval workflows this week. Would you all be open to reviewing a proposal that balances speed with appropriate controls?

Orgtools
Say No to More Meetings
Transform scattered conversations into structured decisions in seconds. No more endless email chains or follow-up meetings to figure out next steps.
Email Chain
From: Nancy Johnson <nancy.johnson@yourcompany.com> To: Anthony Rossi <anthony.rossi@yourcompany.com> Cc: Maya Johnson <maya.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Neil Sharma <neil.sharma@yourcompany.com>, Kevin Hayes <kevin.hayes@yourcompany.com> Date: Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 10:15 AM Subject: URGENT: Reimbursement Process for $1k+ Expenses - Need Decision by Friday Anthony, I need to escalate this expense reimbursement issue and get a decision by Friday. Our current process is creating significant operational problems and employee friction. **The Problem:** - Employees are waiting 3-4 weeks for reimbursements over $1k - Sales team is frustrated because client dinners/travel get delayed approvals - We have 47 pending expense reports totaling $83K sitting in the queue - Employees are using personal credit cards and some are hitting limits **Current Process Issues:** - Every expense over $1k requires 3 manual approvals (manager, finance, executive) - No visibility into where requests are in the pipeline - Paper receipts still required to be mailed in - No emergency/urgent pathway **Impact on Business:** - Neil's sales team is losing deal momentum due to delayed client entertainment approvals - Kevin's IT team is missing conferences because of upfront cost barriers - Maya reports this as a top employee satisfaction complaint **My Analysis & Options:** I've researched what other companies our size are doing and see three viable approaches: 1. **Tiered card limits + monthly sweep**: Give employees company cards with limits based on role, monthly reconciliation 2. **Pre-approval bot in Slack**: Automated workflow for common expenses, instant approval for pre-approved categories 3. **Keep manual approvals but streamline**: Digital-only process, clearer thresholds, 48-hour SLA Anthony - I know budget controls are critical, but the current system is actually costing us more than it's protecting. The operational overhead is significant. Maya - can you quantify the employee impact? Neil/Kevin - what specific business costs are you seeing? I need your decision by Friday to start implementation before year-end travel season. Best, Nancy --- From: Maya Johnson <maya.johnson@yourcompany.com> To: Nancy Johnson <nancy.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Anthony Rossi <anthony.rossi@yourcompany.com> Cc: Neil Sharma <neil.sharma@yourcompany.com>, Kevin Hayes <kevin.hayes@yourcompany.com> Date: Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 2:30 PM Nancy, From the employee perspective, this is our #2 complaint after healthcare issues. Here's the impact I'm seeing: **Employee Impact Data:** - 73% of employees report frustration with current expense process - Average 18 days for reimbursement (goal: 5 days) - 12 formal complaints filed in last quarter - 3 people mentioned it in exit interviews **People Operations Perspective:** Option 1 (Tiered cards) would solve most employee pain points. People want predictability and speed, not complexity. Option 2 (Slack bot) could work but needs careful change management - some employees struggle with new tech. Option 3 (Streamlined manual) is incremental improvement but still frustrating for employees. **My recommendation:** Option 1, but we need robust onboarding: - Clear communication about new limits and process - Training sessions for managers on the new system - FAQ documentation and support during transition - Regular check-ins with high-expense roles (sales, travel-heavy teams) Anthony - from a people perspective, this investment in employee experience will pay dividends in retention and satisfaction. Maya --- From: Neil Sharma <neil.sharma@yourcompany.com> To: Nancy Johnson <nancy.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Maya Johnson <maya.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Anthony Rossi <anthony.rossi@yourcompany.com> Cc: Kevin Hayes <kevin.hayes@yourcompany.com> Date: Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 8:45 AM Maya and Nancy, From the sales side, this is becoming a real problem. Three specific examples from last month: 1. **Lost deal momentum**: Had to delay a client dinner because the $800 expense approval took 2 weeks. Client signed with a competitor during the delay. 2. **Conference opportunity missed**: Director-level prospect invited our rep to an impromptu conference. Couldn't get the $1,200 travel approved in time. 3. **Team morale**: Two of my best reps are frustrated enough that they mentioned it in their 1:1s. They feel like the company doesn't trust them. **Nancy's tiered card approach makes sense to me**, but I'd suggest: - Sales roles should get higher limits during peak seasons (Q4, conference season) - Client entertainment should have expedited approval pathway regardless of amount - Clear guidelines on what constitutes "business expense" vs "personal" **My concerns with current state:** - We're losing deals due to operational friction - Competitors are more agile in client relationship building - Good people are getting frustrated over $1k reimbursements **What I need from any new system:** - Same-day approval for client entertainment under $2k - Clear escalation path for unusual but legitimate expenses - Visibility into approval status (so I can tell reps when to expect reimbursement) Nancy's Option 1 with sales-specific modifications would solve 90% of our issues. Neil --- From: Kevin Hayes <kevin.hayes@yourcompany.com> To: Neil Sharma <neil.sharma@yourcompany.com>, Nancy Johnson <nancy.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Maya Johnson <maya.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Anthony Rossi <anthony.rossi@yourcompany.com> Date: Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 11:20 AM Quick input from the engineering side: **Current pain points:** - Conference travel pre-approvals take so long that early-bird pricing expires - Team members are using personal cards for work equipment and waiting weeks for reimbursement - Had one person decline a speaking opportunity because they couldn't front the travel costs **What would work for us:** Nancy's tiered card system makes sense. For engineering: - Conference/training budget should be separate bucket (pre-approved annually) - Equipment purchases under $500 should auto-approve - Work-from-home setup expenses should have clear guidelines **Technical implementation:** If we go with Option 1, I can build a simple dashboard to track spending by person/department. Would integrate with Slack for notifications when people hit limits. Estimated dev time: 2 weeks for basic version, could be ready by Dec 1. **Vote**: Option 1 (tiered cards) with Nancy's suggested controls. Kevin --- From: Anthony Rossi <anthony.rossi@yourcompany.com> To: Kevin Hayes <kevin.hayes@yourcompany.com>, Neil Sharma <neil.sharma@yourcompany.com>, Nancy Johnson <nancy.johnson@yourcompany.com>, Maya Johnson <maya.johnson@yourcompany.com> Date: Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 9:30 AM Team, Thanks for the thorough analysis. This is exactly the kind of cross-functional problem-solving I like to see. **From the CFO perspective:** The current process is actually worse for financial controls than Nancy's proposed tiered system. We have: - Poor visibility into real-time spending - Delayed expense recognition affecting monthly closes - Administrative overhead that costs more than the controls provide **My decision:** Let's implement Nancy's Option 1 (tiered card system) with the following controls: **Spending Limits:** - IC level: $1k/month - Manager level: $2.5k/month - Director level: $5k/month - VP+ level: $10k/month **Required safeguards:** - Real-time dashboard (Kevin's dev work) - Monthly departmental reporting - Quarterly audit of 10% of transactions - Clear escalation process for amounts above limits **Timeline:** - Nancy: Get corporate card provider quotes by Aug 21 - Kevin: Dashboard ready for testing by Sep 6 - Maya: Draft new expense policy by Aug 26 - Implementation target: January 1 **Questions resolved:** - Neil: Sales can have separate client entertainment cards with higher limits during peak seasons - Kevin: Conference/training treated as separate pre-approved budgets - Everyone: 48-hour reimbursement timeline for emergency expenses This gives us better controls AND better employee experience. The real-time visibility will actually improve our financial oversight. Let's move forward with implementation planning. Anthony
Also works with Zoom meetings, Slack conversations, and documents .
Reclaim your calendar
What used to take meetings, emails, and follow-ups now happens with a click.
Extract Options
Pull ideas from email threads
Map Owners
Assign roles using frameworks
Create Channel
Keep conversations focused
Decision OS
The Platform
Organizational tools to make better, faster decisions.
AI Agents
AI agents enhance decision-making with role-specific expertise and analysis.
Slack
Focus decision-making with Slack-connected channels.
Decision Frameworks
Use frameworks to guide thinking, feedback, and better outcomes.
Decisions
Make better, faster decisions - together.
Memos
Capture context. Share insight. Inform better decisions.
Templates
Standardize knowledge capture for consistent business intelligence.
Topics
Transform scattered insights into organized knowledge.
Blueprints
Codify strategy. Guide every decision.
Key Activities
Clarify ownership. Unblock decisions.
Responsibility Frameworks
Apply proven frameworks to clarify decision roles.
Tags
Instantly organize and contextualize your knowledge.
Enterprise Grid
Scale decision-making across complex organizations.
Frequently Asked Questions
AI Agents are role-specific team members tailored to your company's size, stage, and strategy - like adding specialized expertise you don't have in-house yet. While ChatGPT is great for general tasks, our AI Agents are built with context about your organizational structure and strategy. They provide expert insights directly in Slack, contributing to discussions with the specific expertise and constraints that match your company's reality - not generic advice.
Traditional summaries and action items are single-threaded documents - one person captures what they heard and assigns tasks to others. We focus on collaborative decision-making where the whole team contributes to what matters most. Instead of passive documents that get ignored, we actively drive multi-person decisions forward by organizing conversations into clear, shared action that teams rally around together.
Project management tracks tasks, but it doesn't capture why decisions were made. When team members don't understand the reasoning behind their work, they lose motivation and constantly second-guess priorities. We capture the full decision context - what problem you're solving, what alternatives you considered, and why you chose this path. This becomes institutional knowledge that keeps everyone aligned on the 'why' behind their work.
Actually, we eliminate the coordination overhead that bogs teams down. You know those endless Slack threads where people talk past each other? The meetings where you rehash the same points because no one captured the real decision? We cut through that noise by structuring conversations around clear decisions and driving them to conclusion. Teams move 70% faster because they stop spinning their wheels on the same issues.
Even with good processes, teams often get stuck because decisions feel personal or political. People worry about being wrong, stepping on toes, or missing something important. We depersonalize decisions by using objective frameworks and transparent analysis that makes everyone feel safer to move forward. When the process is clear and fair, teams focus on solving problems instead of protecting themselves.
We work alongside your existing project management tools, not instead of them. During the decision-making process, participants can define action items which can be exported as a CSV file to import into your PM platform. Our AI Agents can also generate comprehensive action items based on all the strategic context - risk assessments, stakeholder impacts, change management requirements, and timeline considerations. This means your PM tool gets not just tasks, but tasks with the full strategic reasoning behind them.
We take your existing conversations and documents - Slack threads, meeting notes, email chains - and automatically structure them into clear decisions ready for your team to discuss and make. While there is a new workflow to learn, we handle the hard part: turning walls of unstructured text, or that 50 page PDF, into organized decisions that fit your org chart and responsibility framework. Teams see immediate value because we're eliminating the manual work of making sense of scattered conversations.
Start with your most painful decision bottleneck - maybe weekly prioritization meetings or budget approvals. Once that's running smoothly, expand to other decision types. The key is proving value quickly in one area before rolling out broadly. Most teams see results within the first week and expand from there.
We offer a free 30-day trial with no credit card required. You can also reach out to sales@orgtools.com for a link to our demo environment where you can click around and explore the platform on your own before committing to anything.